![]() |
|
|
| |
|
ARNES p.p. 7 Jamova 39 1001 Ljubljana tel: (01) 479 88 00 fax: (01) 479 88 99 e-mail: arnes@arnes.si | ||||
|
Seznam slovenskih skupin /news/archive/soc.* si.* si.alt.ateizem |
- Re: Kaj pravi uradna znanost glede Planeta XNazaj na: [Glavno kazalo] [Tematsko kazalo] Urejeno po času
Urejeno po temah
Re: Kaj pravi uradna znanost glede Planeta X
Matjaz wrote in message <3690697D.E37D6B32@xxxxxxx>... >Mark Jean Do wrote: ... >> Kje pa. Dolge zimske noèi so lahko samo razmi?ljali. Niso imeli paè luèi >> (primer na?ih krajev). Ja, potrebovali so mnogo veè èasa, da so si zagotovil >> eksistenco=hrano, ampak ?e vedno jim ga je ostalo kar nekaj. Sploh pa zaradi >> neobremenjenosti niso bili omejeni z kratkimi roki, so paè delali stvari par >> stoletij. Tako kot Sagrade Familio v Barceloni, ki jo ?e delajo. > >Ja hm.... Na Velikonocnih otokih pa zima????? No ja morda pa le ce tako >pravis. Pa tudi "svaka cast" tehnologiji, ki je bila sposobna v eni zimi >isklesati tisoctonske velikane, jih postaviti na obalo in jim na glavo, Hmm, morda sem malo bolj pocasnih misli, vendar mi ni jasno, kako si ti prisel iz *razmisljanja* tokom dolgih zimskih noci na *izvedbo* v eni sami zimi? >iz cistega dolgcasa seveda, povezniti prav tako tezke klobuke. Pri nas >so kvecjemu izrezljali kaksno pobozno podobico iz lesa v tem casu. :) > >Pa dosti sale. Jaz sem mnenja, da ljudje vendarle niso tako iracionalni, >da bi sli kar kamnite glave klesati in to brez razloga ali pa da bi kar >tako zgradili neke piramide iz dolgcasa. Samo ce pogledamo novejso >zgodovino, kjer ima skorajda vsak kip svoje mesto in razlog, prav tako >zgradba. Sploh ne bi rekel. Svet je posejan s grandioznimi konstrukcijami izkljucno kot zelja arhitekta, da pride v zgodovino, kot dokaz sposobnosti le-tega, kot dokaz tehnoloskih moznosti (v cem je po tvojem korist Eiflovega stolpa?) kot dokaz supremacije neke ideologije (npr. komunizma, nacizma, kapitalizma, ...), kot darilo, cast ali spostovanje bogovom ali vladarjem (cel kup takih neverjetnih objektov je bilo postavljenih v ta namen, med drugim ravno piramide, svetisca v J. Ameriki, ...), ... In sploh ni nujno, da so prej navedeni razlogi znak iraconalnosti. >Ljudje smo pac radovedni in nas razlogi in izvor venomer zanima. Pravilno. >Egipcanske piramide pa v zadnjem casu dozivljajo pravo renesanso. Kot >sem ze omenil, so Ameriski geologi skoraj 100% potrdili tezo, da so bile >piramide zgrajene vsaj se plus 5000 let od dosedaj znanega (torej nekje >10000 let nazaj). Khm. Od kje pa ti ta podatek? Iz Misterijev? :-))) No, pri Britannici ocitno Misterijev ne berejo in za njih je se vedno uraden podatek: The pyramids of ancient Egypt were funerary edifices. They were built over a period of 2,700 years, ranging from the beginning of the Old Kingdom to the close of the Ptolemaic Period; but the time at which pyramid building reached its acme, the pyramid age par excellence, was that commencing with the 3rd dynasty and ending with the 6th (c. 2686-2345 BC). During those years the pyramid was the regular type of royal tomb. It was not, as such, an isolated structure, but was always part of an architectural complex. The essential components, during the Old Kingdom at any rate, were the pyramid itself, containing or surmounting the grave proper and standing within an enclosure on high desert ground; an adjacent mortuary temple; and a causeway leading down to a pavilion (usually called the valley temple), situated at the edge of the cultivation and probably connected with the Nile by a canal. About 80 royal pyramids have been found in Egypt, many of them, however, reduced to mere mounds of debris and long ago plundered of their treasures. (see also Index: Egyptian arts and architecture, ancient, funerary architecture) Glede piramid v Gizi pa: Arabic AHRAMAT AL-JIZAH, three 4th-dynasty (c. 2575-c. 2465 BC) pyramids erected on a rocky plateau on the west bank of the Nile River near al-Jizah (Giza), Egypt; they are included among the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. The northernmost and the oldest pyramid of the group was built by Khufu (Greek: Cheops), the second king of the 4th dynasty. Called the Great Pyramid, it is the largest of the three, the length of each side at the base averaging 755 3/4 feet (230.4 m) and its original height being 481 2/5 feet (147 m). The middle pyramid was built by Khafre (Greek: Chephren), the fourth of the eight kings of the 4th dynasty; the structure measures 707 3/4 feet (216 m) on each side and was originally 471 feet (143 m) high. The southernmost and last pyramid to be built was that of Menkaure (Greek: Mycerinus), the sixth king of the 4th dynasty. Each side measures 356 1/2 feet (109 m), and the structure's completed height was 218 feet (66 m). All three pyramids were plundered both internally and externally in ancient times. Thus, most of the grave goods originally deposited in the burial chambers are missing, and the pyramids no longer reach their original heights because they have been almost entirely stripped of their outer casings of smooth white limestone; the Great Pyramid, for example, is now only 451 2/5 feet (138 m) high. Khafre, the middle pyramid, does retain the outer limestone casing at its topmost portion. > Tudi znamenita svinga naj bi danasnjo 'glavo' dobla >kasneje, na njenem 'trupu' pa so odkrili sledove ...vode-morja!!! Prvic slisim. Je pa mozno, da so bile kaksne skoljke ali kaj podobnega v materialu. Medtem si si verjetno ze razjasnil "cudez" pojava skoljk na vrhovih gora? Se nekaj o Sfingi iz Britannice (ne dvomim, da bi v ostalih enciklopedijah nasel drugacne podatke): The earliest and most famous example in art is the colossal recumbent Sphinx at Giza, Egypt, dating from the reign of King Khafre (4th king of 4th dynasty, c. 2575-c. 2465 BC). This is known to be a portrait statue of the king, and the sphinx continued as a royal portrait type through most of Egyptian history. (Arabs, however, know the Sphinx of Giza by the name of Abu al-Hawl, or "Father of Terror.") Through Egyptian influence the sphinx became known in Asia, but its meaning there is uncertain. The sphinx did not occur in Mesopotamia until about 1500 BC, when it was clearly imported from the Levant. In appearance the Asian sphinx differed from its Egyptian model most noticeably in the addition of wings to the leonine body, a feature that continued through its subsequent history in Asia and the Greek world. Another innovation was the female sphinx, which first began to appear in the 15th century BC. On seals, ivories, and metalwork they were portrayed sitting on their haunches, often with one paw raised, and were frequently paired with a lion, a griffin (part eagle and part lion), or another sphinx. >Piramida, kot je velika Keopsova, naj bi bila prvotno neposlikana. Rizbe >in mrliske vezice naj bi svojo podobo dobile kasneje. Kako to, da >hieroglifi in egipcanske slikarije povedo skoraj vse o zivljenju starih >egipcanov, nikjer pa niso odkrili upodobitev graditeljev velikih >piramid? So bili sploh Egipcani tisti, ki so to naredili? Nekako se ne nagibam k vesoljskemu izvoru. :-)) Niti neznanim blazno naprednim civilizacijam, od katerih niso [se] nasli nicesar. Vsaj kaksno plastenko ali steklenico Coca-Bunga bi pricakovali ob piramidah.:-)) LP Marjan
|